Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Merit determinants of ADA Title I allegations filed by persons with mental illness.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Abstract:
      ADA Title I allegations are investigated and closed by the EEOC either with or without merit. Allegations resolved with merit indicate that actual disability employment discrimination took place against the person filing the allegation (the charging party) and those resolved without merit indicate that no discrimination took place. This study examined the drivers or predictors of merit in allegations filed by charging parties with mental illness (e.g., anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and unknown mental illness). Results indicated that the primary driver for ADA Title I allegations is [discrimination] Issue and corroborated the lower merit rate for mental illness allegations (19.83%) as compared to non mental illness allegations (23.39%). Further analysis of the Merit and Non Merit Resolution Types by non parametric tests of proportion between allegations filed by charging parties with mental illness and those filed by charging parties without mental illness also corroborated the lower mental illness allegation merit rate. The lower merit rate for mental illness allegations may indicate that: 1) there is less actual employment discrimination occurring against persons with mental illness; 2) that allegations filed by persons with mental illness are inherently difficult to prove; and/or 3) that the merit rate for mental illness allegations might be higher if they were not potentially under-reported. Implications, conclusions, and directions for future research are provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation is the property of IOS Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
    • ISSN:
      1052-2263
    • Accession Number:
      104460804
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      MCMAHON, B. et al. Merit determinants of ADA Title I allegations filed by persons with mental illness. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, [s. l.], v. 36, n. 3, p. 171–185, 2012. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=104460804&custid=s8280428. Acesso em: 11 jul. 2020.
    • AMA:
      McMahon B, Hurley JE, Monasterio EA, McMahon BT, West SL. Merit determinants of ADA Title I allegations filed by persons with mental illness. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 2012;36(3):171-185. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=104460804&custid=s8280428. Accessed July 11, 2020.
    • AMA11:
      McMahon B, Hurley JE, Monasterio EA, McMahon BT, West SL. Merit determinants of ADA Title I allegations filed by persons with mental illness. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 2012;36(3):171-185. Accessed July 11, 2020. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=104460804&custid=s8280428
    • APA:
      McMahon, B., Hurley, J. E., Monasterio, E. A., McMahon, B. T., & West, S. L. (2012). Merit determinants of ADA Title I allegations filed by persons with mental illness. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 36(3), 171–185.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      McMahon, Brian, Jessica E. Hurley, Eugenio A. Monasterio, Brian T. McMahon, and Steven L. West. 2012. “Merit Determinants of ADA Title I Allegations Filed by Persons with Mental Illness.” Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 36 (3): 171–85. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=104460804&custid=s8280428.
    • Harvard:
      McMahon, B. et al. (2012) ‘Merit determinants of ADA Title I allegations filed by persons with mental illness’, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 36(3), pp. 171–185. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=104460804&custid=s8280428 (Accessed: 11 July 2020).
    • Harvard: Australian:
      McMahon, B, Hurley, JE, Monasterio, EA, McMahon, BT & West, SL 2012, ‘Merit determinants of ADA Title I allegations filed by persons with mental illness’, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 171–185, viewed 11 July 2020, .
    • MLA:
      McMahon, Brian, et al. “Merit Determinants of ADA Title I Allegations Filed by Persons with Mental Illness.” Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, vol. 36, no. 3, June 2012, pp. 171–185. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=104460804&custid=s8280428.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      McMahon, Brian, Jessica E. Hurley, Eugenio A. Monasterio, Brian T. McMahon, and Steven L. West. “Merit Determinants of ADA Title I Allegations Filed by Persons with Mental Illness.” Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 36, no. 3 (June 2012): 171–85. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=104460804&custid=s8280428.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      McMahon B, Hurley JE, Monasterio EA, McMahon BT, West SL. Merit determinants of ADA Title I allegations filed by persons with mental illness. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation [Internet]. 2012 Jun [cited 2020 Jul 11];36(3):171–85. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=104460804&custid=s8280428