World Health Organization. WHO guidelines approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. https://www.who.int/publications/guidelines/atoz/en/. Accessed July 19, 2020.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Guidance and advice list. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/published?type=apg,csg,cg,cov,mpg,ph,sg,sc,dg,hst,ipg,mtg,qs,ta. Accessed July 19, 2020.
Langlois EV, Tunçalp Ö, Norris SL, Askew I, Ghaffar A. Qualitative evidence to improve guidelines and health decision-making. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96(2):79-79A.
Glenton C, Lewin S, Lawrie TA, et al. Qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) for guidelines: paper 3 - using qualitative evidence syntheses to develop implementation considerations and inform implementation processes. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17(1):74.
Glenton C, Lewin S, Norris SL. World Health Organization Handbook for Guideline Development. 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
Ring N, Jepson R, Ritchie K. Methods of synthesizing qualitative research studies for health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):384-390.
Lewin S, Glenton C, Lawrie TA, et al. Qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) for guidelines: paper 2 - using qualitative evidence synthesis findings to inform evidence-to-decision frameworks and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17(1):75.
Carroll C. Qualitative evidence synthesis to improve implementation of clinical guidelines. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed). 2017;j80:356.
Knaapen L, Colvin CJ, Cowl J, van der Weijden T. How to include qualitative research on patient views in guidelines. GIN Public Toolkit. 2015; 28-40.
Tan TPY, Stokes T, Shaw EJ. Use of qualitative research as evidence in the clinical guideline program of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2009;7:169-172.
Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2006.
Kristensen FB, Sigmund H, eds. Health Technology Assessment Handbook. Danish Centre for Health Technology Assessment. Copenhagen: National Board of Health; 2007.
Hansen HP, Draborg E, Kristensen FB. Exploring qualitative research synthesis: the role of patients' perspectives in health policy design and decision making. Patient. 2011;4(3):143-152.
Schünemann HJ, Brożek J, Guyatt GH, Oxman A, eds. GRADE Handbook for Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of recommendations. The GRADE Working Group; Available from guidelinedevelopment.org/handbook. 2013.
GRADE CERQual. Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research. https://www.cerqual.org/. Accessed September 14, 2019.
Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group. https://methods.cochrane.org/qi/welcome. Accessed October 14, 2019.
Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, Moberg J, et al. GRADE evidence to decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: introduction. BMJ. 2016;353:i2016.
Alonso-Coello P, Oxman AD, Moberg J, et al. GRADE evidence to decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: clinical practice guidelines. BMJ. 2016;353:i2089.
NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software [computer program]. Version 122018.
EPPI Reviewer [computer program]. Version 52018.
Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU). Evaluation and Synthesis of Studies Using Qualitative Methods of Analysis. Stockholm: Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU; 2016.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Developing NICE guidelines: the manual. Manchester: NICE; 2018.
Downe S, Finlayson KW, Lawrie TA, et al. Qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) for guidelines: paper 1 - using qualitative evidence synthesis to inform guideline scope and develop qualitative findings statements. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17(1):76.
Ring N, Ritchie K, Mandava L, Jepson R. A Guide to Synthesising Qualitative Research for Researchers Undertaking Health Technology Assessments and Systematic Reviews. Glasgow: Quality Improvement Scotland (NHS QIS); 2010.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). www.prisma-statement.org. Accessed September 14, 2019.
Programme CAS. CASP Qualitative Checklist; 2019. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/ Published 2018. Accessed 14/09/2019.
Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 6th ed. www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. Cochrane; 2019.
Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, Dillon L. Quality in Qualitive Evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence; 2003. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140619055846/http:/www.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/a_quality_framework_tcm6-38740.pdf. Accessed September 14, 2019.
Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research; 2017. https://joannabriggs.org/ebp/critical_appraisal_tools. Accessed September 14, 2019.
Flemming K, Booth A, Garside R, Tuncalp O, Noyes J. Qualitative evidence synthesis for complex interventions and guideline development: clarification of the purpose, designs and relevant methods. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4:e000882.
Booth A, Noyes J, Flemming K, et al. Guidance on choosing qualitative evidence synthesis methods for use in health technology assessments of complex interventions. [Online]. In: Integrate - HTA; 2016.
Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(1):1-8.
France EF, Cunningham M, Ring N, et al. Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):1-13.
The RAMESES Project. https://www.ramesesproject.org/. Accessed September 14, 2019.
Gould N. Integrating qualitative evidence in practice guideline development: meeting the challenge of evidence-based practice for social work. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice. 2010;9:93-109.
Lewin S, Glenton C. Are we entering a new era for qualitative research? Using qualitative evidence to support guidance and guideline development by the World Health Organization. Int J Equity Health. 2018;17:126.
Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9(1):1-11.
Booth A. Acknowledging a dual heritage for qualitative evidence synthesis: harnessing the qualitative research and systematic review research traditions. Sheffield, England: University of Sheffield; 2013.
Carroll C, Booth A. Quality assessment of qualitative evidence for systematic review and synthesis: is it meaningful, and if so, how should it be performed? Res Synth Methods. 2015;6(2):149-154.
Noyes J, Booth A, Cargo M, et al. Cochrane qualitative and implementation methods group guidance series-paper 1: introduction. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;97:35-38.
Booth A, Noyes J, Flemming K, Moore G, Tunçalp Ö, Shakibazadeh E. Formulating questions to explore complex interventions within qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(suppl 1):e001107.
Glenton C, Bohren M, Downe S, Paulsen E, Lewin S. EPOC Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Protocol and review template; 2019.