Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Decertification: Is the Current Trend a Threat to Collective Bargaining?

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Publication Information:
      University of California Graduate School of Business Administration, Graduate School of Management, and Graduate School of Administration, 1981.
    • Publication Date:
      1981
    • Abstract:
      Prior to 1947, employees once represented by a union could not return to nonunion status. With the passage of the Taft-Hartley Act in 1947, the National Labor Relations Board acknowledged for the first time that it could entertain "that negative type of representation proceeding, known as a 'decertification' case." Has decertification had a negative effect on collective bargaining or the labor movement? The number of decertification petitions and elections is increasing, and unions are winning a decreasing percentage of these elections. But the growth in decertification is less a national phenomena than one might think.
    • ISSN:
      00081256
      21628564
    • Accession Number:
      10.2307/41164939
    • Rights:
      © 1981 The Regents of the University of California
    • Accession Number:
      edsjsr.10.2307.41164939
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      WILLIAM E. FULMER. Decertification: Is the Current Trend a Threat to Collective Bargaining? California Management Review, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 1, p. 14, 1981. DOI 10.2307/41164939. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.10.2307.41164939&custid=s8280428. Acesso em: 23 fev. 2020.
    • AMA:
      William E. Fulmer. Decertification: Is the Current Trend a Threat to Collective Bargaining? California Management Review. 1981;24(1):14. doi:10.2307/41164939.
    • APA:
      William E. Fulmer. (1981). Decertification: Is the Current Trend a Threat to Collective Bargaining? California Management Review, 24(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.2307/41164939
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      William E. Fulmer. 1981. “Decertification: Is the Current Trend a Threat to Collective Bargaining?” California Management Review 24 (1): 14. doi:10.2307/41164939.
    • Harvard:
      William E. Fulmer (1981) ‘Decertification: Is the Current Trend a Threat to Collective Bargaining?’, California Management Review, 24(1), p. 14. doi: 10.2307/41164939.
    • Harvard: Australian:
      William E. Fulmer 1981, ‘Decertification: Is the Current Trend a Threat to Collective Bargaining?’, California Management Review, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 14, viewed 23 February 2020, .
    • MLA:
      William E. Fulmer. “Decertification: Is the Current Trend a Threat to Collective Bargaining?” California Management Review, vol. 24, no. 1, 1981, p. 14. EBSCOhost, doi:10.2307/41164939.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      William E. Fulmer. “Decertification: Is the Current Trend a Threat to Collective Bargaining?” California Management Review 24, no. 1 (1981): 14. doi:10.2307/41164939.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      William E. Fulmer. Decertification: Is the Current Trend a Threat to Collective Bargaining? California Management Review [Internet]. 1981 [cited 2020 Feb 23];24(1):14. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.10.2307.41164939&custid=s8280428